So-Called “Rugged” SUVs Sustain Costly Damage in Minor Accidents

So-Called “Rugged” SUVs Sustain Costly Damage in Minor Accidents

Let’s say you are in your 2003 Honda Pilot SUV backing out of a parking space and accidentally back right into another car.  Or you’re driving your 2003 Chrysler Pacifica into a gas station and you swipe a low pole you did not see.  Or you are in your 2003 model Infiniti FX35 or your Cadillac SRX accelerating after coming to a complete stop and another vehicle slams into you.  What do all these accidents have in common?  They involve midsize SUVs driving slowly that sustain major bumper damage. It may come as a shock to learn that these seemingly minor fender benders can result in repair costs as high as $2,814.     

To look at the advertising, you would think SUVs are rugged, but the truth is few have bumpers designed to withstand even a minor bump in a low-speed collision. Eight of nine 2003 midsize SUVs earned poor or marginal ratings for bumper performance in 5 mph crash tests conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. Among the nine vehicles tested only the 2003 Honda Pilot is equipped with bumpers that resisted major damage. The Pilot earned an acceptable rating. The 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor, 2003 Nissan Murano, and 2004 Lexus RX 330 are all rated marginal. The 2003 Toyota 4Runner, 2004 Chrysler Pacifica, 2003 Infiniti FX35, 2004 Cadillac SRX, and 2003 Kia Sorento are all rated poor.

The Institute’s series of four bumper tests includes front- and rear-into-flat-barrier plus front-into-angle-barrier and rear-into-pole impacts. The tests assess how well bumpers can prevent damage in 5 mph impacts simulating the fender-bender collisions that are common in commuter traffic and parking lots. A good bumper system absorbs the energy of these minor impacts and protects expensive body panels, headlamp systems, and other components from damage.

Most of the tested vehicles sustained major damage in minor collisions at a fast walking speed.  Average damage per test ranged from about $400 for the Pilot to more than $1,600 for the Sorento and SRX. Of the 33 current midsize SUVs the Institute has tested for bumper performance, 23 are rated poor, 6 are rated marginal, and 4 are acceptable. None of those tested are rated good.

Three of the poor performers had the largest damage costs in the rear-into-pole test. The rear bumpers on the Chrysler Pacifica, Cadillac SRX, and Kia Sorento were not robust enough to keep damage away from the vehicles’ body parts and sheet metal.  Repair costs in the pole test were about $2,200 for the Sorento and more than $2,800 each for the Pacifica and the SRX. In each case, the tailgate was crushed and needed to be replaced.

The Sorento and SRX were the worst performers overall: Damage to these two vehicles totaled more than $6,500 in all four tests. Even in the front and rear flat-barrier tests, which are the least demanding because the crash energy is spread across the whole bumper, the Kia had repair bills of more $1,000.                       

Infiniti FX35 and Toyota 4Runner also rated poor. After the front-corner test on the Infiniti, more than $2,000 damage was calculated — much of it under the bumper cover. The bumper bar was cracked and bent, the radiator support was broken, and the headlamp assembly needed to be replaced. In the same test on the 4Runner the right fender buckled and the headlamp was crushed in part because the bumper is too short and leaves the corners of the front end unprotected.

The Honda Pilot was the only SUV tested that the Institute rated as having acceptable bumpers. Only the Pilot is equipped with bumpers that did a reasonable job of preventing damage to the vehicle.                   

There are the same inadequate bumpers on many other vehicles.  Of course, auto insurers must factor in the high risk of expensive bodywork for minor accidents when they set insurance premiums, so these costs get passed along to consumers in their auto insurance premiums.  “It’s not difficult or expensive to build a decent bumper,” says Adrian Lund, the Institute’s chief operating officer. “The Honda bumper system isn’t great, but it’s the best of a sorry lot. It shows that manufacturers can build SUVs with bumper systems that prevent costly damage in a minor collision.”